This is what is consistent with international practice and understanding, and does NOT provide universal healthcare.
Terry Lum 10, Henry G. Leong Professor in Social Work and Social Administration, Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, “Review of Social Security, the Economy and Development,” Social Service Review, vol. 84, no. 4, The University of Chicago Press, 2010, pp. 702–704
The term “social security” refers to many different programs across nations. In the United States, it narrowly refers to the social insurance programs that operate under the Social Security Act (U.S. Code, title 42). These programs mainly serve retired workers, people with disabilities, and their dependents. In European countries, it refers to a variety of income protection programs, including means-tested social welfare programs, contributory social insurance, and even health insurance. In less developed countries, it refers to the minimal government programs for the poor. The diversity of definitions makes crossnational comparison challenging. In this book, Tang and Midgley define social security broadly as “programmes that provide for the maintenance of income when specific contingencies arise or otherwise supplement the incomes of those who experience particular needs or demands on their income” (22). They argue that while form and structure of social security programs differ across nations, the basic underlying principles are the same; they provide income support for vulnerable people.