‘Should’ requires action be mandated.

Marmolejo also quibbles with the language of the district court's admonishment. Marmolejo complains the district court used the word "should" instead of "must," suggesting the instruction was just an encouragement and optional rather than mandatory. We disagree. Admittedly, the district court's instruction is cloaked in polite language rather than as a strict command to the jury. But no matter how the district court phrased its admonishment, it did instruct the jury to "disregard any comments or behavior that you may have observed or heard as those people were asked to leave the courtroom." This admonishment, coupled with the jury instruction to consider only the admitted evidence, was a sufficiently curative instruction.