The third and fourth plank resolves structural issues with federalism and guarantees state autonomy in the future.

The core findings still hold—state policy in recent years has become more ideologically driven and there is a growing tendency to strip authority away from urban population centers. But the report’s prognosis is far more hopeful as the country will now enter a critical phase in which federalism demands a serious and intentional revision. Once we emerge from the current public health catastrophe there will be a need to revise fiscal outlooks, government relationships and partnerships.

America’s future will depend on refashioning and getting the balance right—clearly, fairly and effectively distributing authority and strengthening the bond between government levels that has frayed in recent years

The report’s conclusions are encouraging: There is a growing number of policy actors in cities across America organizing and advancing a counterweight. In many states, mayors, foundations, universities, professional organizations and advocacy groups are beginning to work both collectively and strategically, the report notes. On a parallel track, a number of government and legal scholars are redefining city and state relations by drafting new frameworks that ensure state authority while also allowing cities to advance policy that protects and supports their residents. This white paper details this progress and spells out a path forward for cities to regain rightful self-governance. 

The report offers the following key recommendations to restore this balance: 

Create new systems for state-level agenda setting. The report advocates for a well-organized agenda setting process to counter ideologically-rooted policymaking.

Develop a better talent pipeline. There is significant demand for talent generation, the report found; more policy and political acumen in and outside of state government is needed. 

Adopt a new intergovernmental relations model in this country, what is termed “Localism 2.0.” With far too much confusion about the lines of state and local policy authority and responsibility, a thoughtful and democratic review of federalism is long overdue. Localism 2.0 will clearly spell out a balanced role between state and local governments, clarify the authority and scope of local government, and establish greater consistency and logic for reviews and revisions of intergovernmental arrangements. 

In summation, this report examines the diminished authority of local governance in the United States and what can be done about it. The report found that far greater collaboration has emerged amongst cities, professional organizations, universities and advocacy groups in recent years. Additionally, both local and national philanthropists have a greater appreciation of strategy and the need for funding consistency and coordination. But to reach anything akin to policy balance at the state level requires a thorough re-examination of intergovernmental relations that better protects both public will and local authority. This change, in turn, should be complemented with state-level agenda setting and leadership development. Finally, the white paper recommends that private philanthropy step up with significant, consistent investments to support this crucial infrastructure.