Free beta access. 50 free AI tokens each week. Optional top-ups available. See what is included
Opening Word document…

The fifth plank generates more than enough cash.

Tharpe 19 [Wesley; Senior advisor for state tax policy and M.A. in public policy from the Johns Hopkins University; 2/7/2019; Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; https://www.cbpp.org/blog/millionaires-taxes-a-smart-way-for-states-to-invest-in-their-future; accessed 6/27/2023; Lowell-WN]

With the 2019 legislative season starting in most states, some states are discussing whether to raise personal income tax rates on their highest-income households (sometimes called a “millionaires’ tax”) to help fund schools, infrastructure, and other public investments. Our  shows why that makes sense.

Targeted income tax hikes at the top can generate significant revenues for states to invest in their long-term success — without harming their ability to grow their economies and create jobs in the short term.

Millionaires’ taxes are becoming increasingly common, with states such as California, Minnesota, and Maryland using them to minimize harmful program cuts when the economy slows and states still must balance their budgets, or to make bold new investments like expanding early education or boosting college access. In some cases, these policies only affect annual incomes above $1 million, although in several states the higher rates kick in at lower thresholds.

The trend looks likely to continue:

New York lawmakers  making their state’s millionaires’ tax, enacted in 2009, permanent in order to preserve about $4 billion in annual funding for public services.

Illinois policymakers are  as part of a broader push to replace the state’s regressive flat tax with a fairer graduated system.

New Jersey, which raised rates on incomes above $5 million in 2018,  another rate increase for high earners below that level.

Maine  at the policy as well, after conservative lawmakers overturned a ballot initiative that voters approved in 2016 to raise taxes on top earners.

Targeted income tax hikes at the top don’t harm a state’s ability to compete economically with its neighbors, real-world experience shows. Of the eight states (including the District of Columbia) that have enacted lasting millionaires’ taxes since 2000:

seven have had per capita personal income growth at least as strong as their neighbors since raising taxes;

six have had growth in private-sector gross domestic product about as good as or better than their neighbors (see chart); and

five added jobs at least as quickly as their neighbors.

Sign in to recut, update, or save this card.