Free beta access. 50 free AI tokens each week. Optional top-ups available. See what is included
Opening Word document…

Negative effects will reshuffle.

Powell 05 [Benjamin, Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute and Director of the Free Market Institute at Texas Tech University., “It’s Time to End Farm Subsidies”, https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=1477] Jericho

An end to farm subsidies would not mean an end to farming in the U.S. Prices of farmland would decline, allowing some farmers to remain in business, and we would reshuffle production to those crops that American farmers most efficiently produce.

Instead of a politics-as-usual debate over a trivial 3.5 percent decrease in agricultural subsidies, policymakers should reconsider why the federal government subsidizes agriculture at all. It hurts the world’s poor, makes food prices higher for consumers in the U.S., and the benefits don’t accrue to small farmers. Of course politicians don’t debate ending farm subsidies because it would eliminate one type of “food”—the pork congress members get to dole out.

Sign in to recut, update, or save this card.