The cp provides the opportunity for pilots to spill-over to additional pilot programs

(Colleen V. Chien, Justin D'Atri Visiting Professor of Business Law, Columbia Law School; Professor, Santa Clara University School of Law; 2013-2015 White House Senior Advisor, Innovation and Intellectual Property, “Rigorous Policy Pilots: Experimentation in the Administration of the Law, July, 2019, “104 Iowa L. Rev. 2313,” pg lexis//um-ef)

If the premise of this Essay - that using rigorous piloting is legal, feasible, and desirable - is correct, then it is incumbent upon policymakers to think about how to make it easier. The descriptions above and discussions at the companion workshop to this Essay reveal a number of suggestions for doing so: Clear obstacles to federal agency RCTs imposed, for example, by the Paperwork Reduction Act ("PRA"), reduce burdens associated with receiving feedback from stakeholders in general imposed through the Paperwork Reduction Act, create a networking mechanism for connecting federal agencies and academics interested in collaborating on rigorous policy pilots, provide dedicated capacity within government to support policy development through experiments (similar to what OES does for program implementation), make it easier for agencies to get access to the resources they need to carry out pilots, create safe harbors for agencies around the disclosure of procedurally adequate experimentation and its results, support evaluation and piloting mandates within statutes.