Opening Word document…

Corroborating evidence

Pelke 21, M.A., dissertation in fulfillment of Ph.D. in economics, University of Heidelberg (Lars Pelke, 2021, “Rethinking Inequality under Autocracy. Parties, Citizens, and Preferences,” Chapter 1: Introduction, https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/30270/1/Pelke_Dissertation_2021.pdf)

The third central concept is (income) redistribution. As Tullock argues, ‘‘redistribution is probably the most important function of most modern governments’’ (Tullock, 2013, p. 1). However, the level of redistribution and its cross-sectional variation cannot be modeled using only purely economic explanations, such as the level of inequality in a given society (see McCarty & Pontusson, 2009). Therefore, I focus on the question of how political processes and institutions, such as autocratic ruling strategies and the degree of incumbent party institutionalization, determine the level of redistribution and inequality. In this dissertation, redistribution is broadly defined as the transfer of resources from one person or group to another person or group (see also Albertus, 2015; Boadway & Keen, 2000; Solt, 2020; Tullock, 2013). More precisely, income or fiscal redistribution is defined as the transfer of resources via taxes and fiscal transfer policies from one person or group to another. By contrast, land redistribution —a second influential type of redistribution (Albertus, 2015) —is defined as land reform measures that lead to a reallocation of land properties from landed elites to the landed poor.10 In addition, income redistribution is also often conceptualized as the transfer of resources to the poor.

Sign in to recut, update, or save this card.