Opening Word document…

AI inventorship does not vest legal rights to AI. It protects the moral rights of human inventors

Abbott, 2019 (Ryan, MD, JD, MTOM, Professor of Law and Health Sciences at University of Surrey, UK, https://www.cipco.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:1a3a7015-02c8-4b38-954b-961ef12308d0/Pr%C3%A4sentation Abbott_CIPCO Online Workshop 11.06.2021.pdf, December)

Of course, an AI would not own a patent. We have never suggested this, and I am not aware of anyone seriously making such an argument. AI systems lack both legal and moral rights and thus the ability to own property. Moreover, there would be significant costs and no obvious benefits to changing laws to allow AI ownership. Nevertheless, many of the objections to the Artificial Inventor Project have unfortunately focused on AI ownership. Again, listing an AI as an inventor is not a matter of providing rights to machines, but it would protect the moral rights of traditional human inventors and the integrity of the patent system. As discussed earlier, it is frequently the case that the inventor of a patent is not its owner. We also believe that an AI’s owner should own any patents on AI-generated inventions, in line with general principles of property ownership as well as rules that apply to other areas of intellectual property (IP) law such as trade secret protections.

Sign in to recut, update, or save this card.