In the context of patents, those are damages and injunctions
Hovenkamp* and Hovenkamp** 17, *Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard Law School, Project on the Foundations of Private Law; Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School, Information Society Project. **James G. Dinan Professor, Penn Law and Wharton Business School, University of Pennsylvania. (Erik* and Herbert**, 2017, “PATENT DAMAGES SYMPOSIUM: Buying Monopoly: Antitrust Limits on Damages for Externally Acquired Patents”, 25 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 39, 43. Lexis accessed online via KU libraries)
Patent enforcement mechanisms are mainly private. Remedies include both damages and private injunctive relief. 11 Such actions are essential to patent law's overall goal of promoting innovation and the efficient commercialization of patented technologies. So they are not "private" at all in the sense that their purpose is simply to transfer wealth from one person to another, or to provide compensation for past harms. Rather, patent damages should give the patentee the correct set of incentives to innovate by deterring infringers. Antitrust damages actions serve a similar purpose within antitrust's domain.