Big Tech resists and lobbies against strengthening patent rights empirically.
Barnett 21 [Jonathan M. Barnett; Torrey H. Webb Professor of Law at the Gould School of Law, University of Southern California; 2021; Why Big Tech Likes Weak IP; Cato Institute; https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2021/why-big-tech-likes-weak-ip; 7-25-2024; AO]
Lobbying behavior/ To test this hypothesis, I reviewed and gathered evidence on the lobbying behavior of various technology-intensive industries. Historical examples show that large, integrated firms resisted strong patent protection in the late 19th-century railroad industry, as did large, integrated firms like IBM in the computing industry of the 1960s and 1970s. Both industries have in common the fact that incumbents offered a bundled package of intangible and tangible assets and therefore resisted patent protection that facilitated entry by suppliers of discrete components of that package. More recent evidence shows that some of the largest technology firms were among the most vigorous supporters of the America Invents Act. Enacted in 2011, that statute substantially expanded opportunities for third parties to contest the validity of patents, principally through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). It is likely not accidental that these same firms have been among the most active petitioners at the PTAB seeking to invalidate issued patents.