Redistribution naturalizes heterosexuality in the economic realm.
Nikita Dhawan et al. 15 is Professor of Political Science at the Leopold-Franzen University Innsbruck and Director of the Frankfurt Research Center for Postcolonial Studies, Cluster of Excellence ‘The Formation of Normative Orders’, Goethe University Frankfurt. She has held visiting fellowships at Universidad de Costa Rica (2013); Institute for International Law and the Humanities, University of Melbourne, Australia (2013); Program of Critical Theory, University of California, Berkeley, USA (2012); University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain (2011); Pusan National University, South Korea (2011); Columbia University, New York, USA (2008). Her publications include Impossible Speech: On the Politics of Silence and Violence (2007), Decolonizing Enlightenment: Transnational Justice, Human Rights and Democracy in a Postcolonial World (editor, 2014); Postkoloniale Theorie: Eine kritische Einführung (with Maria do Mar Castro Varela, 2014). Antke Engel is Director of the Institute for Queer Theory in Berlin, a site where academic debate meets up with political activism and artistic/cultural practices (www.queer-institut.de). She received her PhD in Philosophy at Potsdam University and works as independent scholar in the fields of queer, feminist and poststructuralist theory, political philosophy and visual cultural studies. She held visiting professorships at Hamburg University (2003–2005) and at Vienna University (2011), and a research fellowship at the ICI Berlin Institute for Cultural Inquiry (2007–2009). She has published numerous essays and the two monographs Wider die Eindeutigkeit (2002) and Bilder von Sexualität und Ökonomie (2009). Jule Jacob Gorvin is a PhD candidate in philosophy at Freie Universität Berlin and a research assistant at the Institute for Queer Theory, Berlin. After studying philosophy and comparative literature at Freie Universität and the University of Paris VIII, she published several articles, including Widerspenstige Körper: Ein Vergleich körperkonzeptueller Widerstandsstrategien bei Judith Butler und Pierre Bourdieu (2012). In her PhD project Aufbegehren und Begierden: Zum Verhältnis von Begehren und Ökonomie, she is focusing on the epistemological and socio-political entanglements of desire and economy in the light of neoliberalism. Her research interests include political and social philosophy, theories of desire, sexuality studies, body politics, poststructuralism, psychoanalysis and philosophy of economy. Christoph F. E. Holzhey is the founding director of the ICI Berlin Institute for Cultural Inquiry. He received a PhD in theoretical physics (1993) and another in German literature with a dissertation on the critical potential of paradoxical pleasures (2001). His edited volumes include Tension/Spannung (2011), The Scandal of Self-Contradiction: Pasolini’s Multistable Subjectivities, Traditions, Geographies (with L. Di Blasi and M. Gragnolati, 2012), Situiertes Wissen und regionale Epistemologie: Zur Aktualität Georges Canguilhems und Donna J. Haraways (with A. Deuber-Mankowsky, 2013), Multistable Figures: On the Critical Potentials of Ir/Reversible Aspect-Seeing (2014) and Wendy Brown and Rainer Forst, The Power of Tolerance: A Debate (editor, with L. Di Blasi, 2014). Volker Woltersdorff (aka Lore Logorrhöe) is an independent scholar and affiliated fellow at the ICI Berlin Institute for Cultural Inquiry. He received a PhD in Comparative Literature at the Freie Universität Berlin with a thesis on gay coming-out narrative and practice. From 1999 to 2010 he was research assistant at the Institute of Comparative Literature of Freie Universität Berlin and Member of the Collaborative Research Centre ‘Kulturen des Performativen’. His main research interests lie in queer and feminist theories, studies in sadomasochism, subcultural aesthetics and the intersection of heteronormativity and capitalism. He has published numerous essays and the monograph Coming out: Die Inszenierung schwuler Identitäten zwischen Auflehnung und Anpassung (2005). (Global Justice and Desire | “Introduction” | DOA: 4/19/2023 | SAoki)
One of the key questions for critical social theory in general, and postcolonial, queer, feminist in particular, is the challenging question of why subjects desire their own subjugation. In one of the most interesting analyses of the complex discontinuity between desire and interest, Gayatri Spivak in ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ (1988) critiques Deleuze and Foucault’s claim that the oppressed know about the conditions of their exploitation and are able to speak for themselves. In Spivak’s view, their position risks conflating desire and interest, thus constructing an undivided political subject. They thereby fail to address contemporary forms of economic exploitation, especially the superexploitation of women in the global South, by ignoring the gendered ideological subject constitution on both sides of the colonial divide. By focusing on the incoherence between desire and interest, Spivak emphasizes the importance of critique of ideology even as she contests any simplistic understanding of politics as the rational and economic pursuit of justice and rights (Castro Varela and Dhawan 2014; also cf. Weiss, Chapter 4 in this volume). According to her, economic and political transformation is incomplete without the accompanying intervention in the subject production of the hegemon and subaltern in both the global North and South. While desire for economic justice is often coded in terms of reducing all value to its pecuniary equivalent, desiring other economies can take the form of envisaging alternate modes of recognizing value other than financial compensation (GibsonGraham 2006). In contrast to discussions on sexual and economic justice that primarily attend to demands for redistribution and recognition, often presenting them as oppositional or adversarial (Hennessy 2000; Fraser and Honneth 2003), we suggest a shift of focus. Supplementing debates about redistribution and recognition, we propose that issues of representation are equally essential (GibsonGraham 1996; Butler 1998; Spivak 1999; Engel 2002; Kapur 2005; Gressgård, Chapter 5; Binnie, Chapter 8; and Kapur, Chapter 6 in this volume). Accordingly, it is imperative to assess whether the subjects who are affected by unjust structures have a say in the apparatuses of value-coding (Spivak 2012: 59). Thus, a politics of sexual and socio-economic justice raises the question of how people are involved in the decision-making processes of intervening in and transforming these arrangements of value-coding. Drawing on Marx, Spivak argues that ‘the logic of capitalism weaves the socius like the textile of a particular set of relationships. Power and validation within this socius are secured by denying that web and transforming/ displacing it into “natural” readability’ (Spivak 2012: 59). From a queer perspective, naturalized heterosexuality is part of weaving the socius – like kinship, ethnic and transnational relations – into the structures of neoliberal political economy, while at the same time rendering these mechanisms invisible. Problematizing any straightforward relations between justice and capitalism, this book highlights how postcolonial-queer-feminist struggles for economic and sexual justice are not just about organizing material goods for the suffering classes or mobilizing (sexual) rights for disenfranchised communities – where the deprived are reduced to their needs, which are coded as transparent to our reading practices. Rather, they are about engaging with the imagination and desires of both dispensers as well as receivers of justice.