Opening Word document…

The aff undermines the perception of willfulness to fight

Pierce 12 – Colonel in USAF

(Jeffery, 6-17-12, Mater’s Thesis, “Coercion: A Credible and Capable United States Military Instrument of Power Key to Future US Foreign Policy Success,” http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a562347.pdf)

To accomplish foreign policy goals without resorting to war, the United States (US) will need to employ coercion to shape the environment to favor US interests. Successfully coercing nations to comply with US demands will require developing a clear strategy, with realistic and consistent goals, along with credible means to issue threats of escalating force that are capable of imposing the stated objectives. A credible and capable military instrument of power is a key to successful coercion. Coercion attempts to manipulate an adversary’s behavior to comply with demands levied by the coercer. The coercer uses the elements of national power to deter or, if necessary compel acceptance. Compellence is obtained by increasing the perceived or real cost of behavior to exceed the benefits gained by the adversary. Therefore, the coercer must develop a strategy that makes the adversary perceive the cost will be too high, as the adversary’s perception is essential to alter unwanted behavior. To increase the perception of cost, threats must be credible and capable in order to achieve escalation dominance over the adversary. Credibility is achieved by keeping all options available publicly, not unnecessarily limiting options or levels and types of force employed. Though force limits will likely be applied, keeping these limits secret from the adversary are important to winning the perception battle. Capability is achieved by making forces appear flexible to accomplish required missions. Eliminating undue public restrictions will make it more difficult for the adversary to counter the coercive force. However, threats should not be issued or implied unless the coercer has the will to employ the threat. 80 Political leaders will have greater success in remaining credible when they agree on when and how to employ US forces before making interventions in foreign affairs. The case studies show that actions or statements that reduce the appearance of commitment also reduce the credibility of US demands. Once credibility is undermined, the adversary will believe the US forces employed also lack the capability required to impose the unwanted demand. This lack of credibility and capability encourages the adversary to counter the coercion or simply wait until the coercer tires of the struggle.

Sign in to recut, update, or save this card.