NIH Research is Unreliable and Unable to Cure Chronic Diseases.

This study is to explore why modern medicine fails to find cures for chronic diseases. By conducting a review of NIH funding policies, I found that NIH is primarily responsible for creating the narrow modern medicine that is unable to cure chronic diseases. By influencing research programs for decades, NIH has promoted peer review system, the general acceptance standard, the use of randomized controlled trials, objective evidence standard, precision medicine, evidence-based medicine, exclusion of personalized medicine, rejection of broader mind-body model, rejection of personal observational evidence, etc. By influencing research programs, NIH is primarily responsible for excluding, rejecting, and suppressing personalized medicine including fork remedies, family-owned remedies, and personal discoveries from the world, and forming the wrong notion of incurable diseases. While most of the NIH research programs may yield potentially useful medical knowledge, most funded programs intended to treat diseases by directly intervening human biological networks failed for decades. I must find that such research programs are expected to fail forever. The bases of my prediction are that (1) medical research methods are grossly inaccurate with most mathematical models being wrong, (2) some fundamental concepts in biochemistry are inaccurate, always incomplete, or even completely wrong, and (3) most health properties beneath the life phenomenon are beyond human ability to characterize. Scientists are unable to characterize the full details of human biological networks and biological pathway interactions. Those limitations are insurmountable in light of the fact that chronic diseases are caused by small departures in process attributes in the human biological pathway networks. I must also predict that most NIH-funded research programs attempted to intervene the human biological networks are deemed to fail or will not benefit people in our time. I urge NIH to deeply examine its past funding policies and consistent failure in chronic diseases, and expand its funding scope to cover evolution-compatible remedies, fork remedies, and personal discoveries, many of which have been proved by irrefutable evidence to be predictable cures for chronic diseases.