Opening Word document…
Significance is ambiguous.
Davis ’6 [Ronald; Fall; independent antitrust practitioner in Atlanta, Georgia, and has consulted on some of the litigation discussed in this article; ABA Antitrust Magazine, “Reverse Payment Patent Settlements: A View Into the Abyss, And a Modest Proposal,” 21 Antitrust ABA 26]
Hovenkamp et al., supra note 38, at 1758 (footnote omitted). O'Rourke and Brodley rightly note that the rule is ambiguous, because a "significant" likelihood of success means different things to different people. Maureen A. O'Rourke & Joseph A. Brodley, An Incentives Approach to Patent Settlements: A Commentary on Hovenkamp, Janis and Lemley, 87 MINN. L. REV. 1767, 1783 (2003).
Sign in to recut, update, or save this card.