Search the archive.

The past six months has brought a stream of bad news for China's economy: slow growth, record youth unemployment, low foreign investment, weak exports and currency, and a property sector in crisis.

US President Joe Biden described the world's second-largest economy as "a ticking time bomb", predicting growing discontent in the country.

China's economy has demonstrated extraordinary resilience in the face of the global economy slowdown, the SARS tragedy, and the stresses of WTO entry. This resilience results from the successful shift to domestic-led growth and from rising productivity caused by economic reform, rising competition, and highly entrepreneurial economic structure, and high levels of foreign direct investment. China's successes are being achieved by reforms that overcome severe challenges. Among these challenges are a pressures on China to revalue its currency and China's rapidly expanding money supply and overheating economic expansion. What distinguishes China from other countries facing similar challenges is that it has chosen a process of gradual reform and opening that has proved successful in other Asia countries. It has also demonstrated an ability to form a workable leadership consensus regarding its most important problems, to implement solutions in the face of great political and social stress, and to overcome the stress by delivering large benefits for most of the Chinese people.

In an interview with Xinhua, Ma said Alibaba was a victim of counterfeits as the sale of one fake product could lead to the loss of five customers.

"I don't believe success can built on dishonesty," he said, dismissing some comments that Alibaba took advantage of counterfeits.

China's  represented more than 54% of the economic output in 2023. By contrast, the services industry represented slightly more than 46% of GDP in 2013.3 Consumption of goods is a major factor and driver of growth and continues to help boost the country's economy. The country reported $6.63 trillion in 2023, which is an increase of 7.2% in one year.4

China's retail sales increased 10.1% between November 2022 and November 2023.  represent consumer spending within the economy.5 As a comparison, retail sales in the United States showed an increase of just over 4% within that same period.6

On June 16, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Work Leading Group Office led a joint task force to crack down on infringement and counterfeiting around Guangzhou Railway Station.

In recent years, China has stepped up its efforts to combat counterfeit goods by strengthening laws, raising fines, and utilizing technologies like big data and artificial intelligence to improve surveillance of such activities.

In 2022, with the pandemic hindering the recovery of the world economy, China enhanced its focus on intellectual property rights with amendments to laws and regulations, and strengthened law enforcement and justice to combat new trends in infringement and counterfeiting. The amendments to the framework concerning the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in 2022 included:

[paragraph breaks stop]

BEIJING -- Authorities in China have solved more than 1,700 criminal cases involving online copyright infringement and counterfeiting so far this year amid an intensified crackdown on such illegal activities through multiple campaigns, the Ministry of Public Security said Wednesday.

A number of criminal networks that produce and sell counterfeit goods have been eliminated during the process in an effort to create a sound online business and shopping environment for enterprises and consumers, according to a statement from the ministry.

Amazon said it helped protect customers from fake goods by working with law enforcement to seize over 240,000 counterfeits in China. Amazon’s Counterfeit Crimes Unit (CCU) tipped off agencies, which it said nabbed the imitation luxury, sports, and automotive brands.

Authorities detained the main suspects, and “any infringing listings connected to these cases have been eliminated,” Amazon said in Wednesday’s announcement, which provided additional details including the following:

On June 16, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Work Leading Group Office led a joint task force to crack down on infringement and counterfeiting around Guangzhou Railway Station.

In recent years, China has stepped up its efforts to combat counterfeit goods by strengthening laws, raising fines, and utilizing technologies like big data and artificial intelligence to improve surveillance of such activities.

With the booming development of Internet and AI technology in mainland China, some IP companies and firms have also established their own online platforms to conduct IP infringement monitoring and time-stamp authentication. For simple monitoring, clients can use this by themselves. For complicated monitoring that may require legal analysis, local counsel will be involved to provide legal services.

Cooperation with national anti-counterfeiting agencies

In China, brand owners have an arsenal of civil and criminal laws and regulations at their disposal, which provide various remedies to use in pursuit of efficient and effective anti-counterfeiting enforcement programs. For example, IP rights holders have the ability to initiate a civil litigation before the local Court in which they can seek, among other things, compensation, and injunctive relief. If an infringer’s behavior constitutes a crime, the local Public Security Bureau (PSB) may initiate a criminal action. In addition, IP rights holders have the ability to record their IP rights with Customs, file complaints with online e-commerce platforms, and file complaints with the local Administrative Authority (the AIC). Both Customs and AIC have the authority to seize goods and AIC may also levy fines and conduct raids. E-commerce platforms set their own rules as to how to enforce against counterfeiting violations. In some instances, the platforms have been known to cooperate with, and even proactively share evidence with, law enforcement and/or brand owners regarding potential counterfeit rings or manufacturing operations.

The primary laws relating to IP in China are: Trademark Law; Copyright Law; Patent Law; Administrative Punishment Law; E-commence Law; Anti-unfair Competition Law; Civil Procedure Law; and Criminal Procedure Law.

The trade agreement signed Wednesday by President Donald Trump and China includes a provision to stanch the sale of counterfeit goods on e-commerce platforms like Amazon The U.S. and China agreed that both parties will work to “combat the prevalence of counterfeit or pirated goods” by taking “effective action” when the online platforms have failed to prevent intellectual property infringement.

China has agreed to consider revoking an e-commerce platform’s operating license if there are repeated sales of counterfeit or pirated goods. The U.S., meanwhile, has agreed to study additional measures of combating the online sale of counterfeit or pirated goods. It comes as Amazon faces increasing criticism over its failure to crack down on counterfeit goods. While the company says it has a “zero tolerance” policy for copycat products and has developed tools to help manage the problem, its marketplace of third-party sellers continues to be plagued by pirated goods. The problem has grown so severe that advocacy groups have called for some Amazon sites to be added to the U.S. government’s annual “Notorious Markets” list, which names sites and companies that facilitate the sale of counterfeit goods.

In China, brand owners have an arsenal of civil and criminal laws and regulations at their disposal, which provide various remedies to use in pursuit of efficient and effective anti-counterfeiting enforcement programs. For example, IP rights holders have the ability to initiate a civil litigation before the local Court in which they can seek, among other things, compensation, and injunctive relief. If an infringer’s behavior constitutes a crime, the local Public Security Bureau (PSB) may initiate a criminal action. In addition, IP rights holders have the ability to record their IP rights with Customs, file complaints with online e-commerce platforms, and file complaints with the local Administrative Authority (the AIC). Both Customs and AIC have the authority to seize goods and AIC may also levy fines and conduct raids. E-commerce platforms set their own rules as to how to enforce against counterfeiting violations. In some instances, the platforms have been known to cooperate with, and even proactively share evidence with, law enforcement and/or brand owners regarding potential counterfeit rings or manufacturing operations.

The primary laws relating to IP in China are: Trademark Law; Copyright Law; Patent Law; Administrative Punishment Law; E-commence Law; Anti-unfair Competition Law; Civil Procedure Law; and Criminal Procedure Law.

On August 24, 2018, the U.S. imposed 25% tariffs on another $16 billion of Chinese goods. Among the 279 Chinese products affected, most are industrial products. The rationale for the sanctions is based on the conclusion that China is engaged in unfair trade practices harming the United States, especially through intellectual property theft.

Over 86% of counterfeits sold worldwide are purportedly from China, a fact well-documented prior to the imposition of tariffs. It remains to be seen whether tariffs will lead to any significant improvement in this statistic, and if so, when.

The tensions in US-China trade relations threaten the entire global economy, not just the relations inside the Group of Two. As a result of the US-China trade cut, global growth can be expected to decline by 0.5% in 2020 [23].

The World Bank analysts have used a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model to make an economic forecast: introduction of a 25% tariff on all goods of Chinese imports to the US will reduce world exports by 3% and the global product by 1.7%. “The analysis shows that a US-China tariff escalation could reduce global exports by up to 3 percent (674 billion dollars) and global income by up to 1.7 percent (1.4 trillion dollars) with losses across regions”. “The biggest declines in incomes are recorded by China and the US, up to 3.5% (USD 426 billion) and 1.6% (USD 313 billion), respectively. The sectors most affected include: agriculture, chemicals and transport equipment in the US; and electronic equipment, machinery and other manufacturing in China” [24].

If counterfeiting continues to increase, the costs associated with counterfeiting will eventually outweigh the benefits of producing or selling the brand in China. At that point, brand owners will be confronted with the choice of discontinuing the brand in China or rethinking their current approach. Brand owners may take the drastic step of curtailing or withdrawing their investments from China or brand owners and foreign governments may adopt a confrontational approach with China. If brand owners and foreign governments attempt to pressure China with confrontational tactics, it is unclear that such an approach will achieve positive results in reducing counterfeiting.178

[Footnote 178: Attempts by the United States to pressure China over copyright piracy issues in the early 1990s almost led to a trade war on two occasions with both sides refusing to back down. See supra note 27. A trade war was averted by last minute maneuvering, but because China has made significant economic progress since the early 1990s and is in a stronger economic position in relation to other nations, China may be unwilling to back down in face of new pressures from the United States or other foreign governments over counterfeiting issues.]

Five years ago — and certainly a decade ago — coercive annexation of Taiwan by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) might have seemed an extreme scenario. Unfortunately, this is no longer the case. The rising crescendo of PRC air and maritime pressure operations near the island, missile firings, and so on are bringing Beijing within a few steps of the maritime quarantine or similar operations that would likely be central to an attempt at coercive annexation.

Meanwhile, China’s meteoric military buildup across the board gravely threatens other nations. Backstopping it all is a major nuclear weapons ramp-up, the latest elements of which are detailed here to the very cutting-edge of public information, much of it from the Pentagon’s just-released 2023 “China Military Power Report”.[1] Based on this information, we conclude that if the PRC succeeded in coercively annexing Taiwan, repercussions could include nuclear proliferation with regional — and even global — security consequences.

The world's second-largest economy, home to more than 1.4 billion people, is facing a host of problems - including slow growth, high youth unemployment and a property market in disarray.

Now the chairman of the country's heavily indebted real estate developer, Evergrande, has been placed under police surveillance and the company's shares have been suspended on the stock market.

The tensions in US-China trade relations threaten the entire global economy, not just the relations inside the Group of Two. As a result of the US-China trade cut, global growth can be expected to decline by 0.5% in 2020 [23].

The World Bank analysts have used a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model to make an economic forecast: introduction of a 25% tariff on all goods of Chinese imports to the US will reduce world exports by 3% and the global product by 1.7%. “The analysis shows that a US-China tariff escalation could reduce global exports by up to 3 percent (674 billion dollars) and global income by up to 1.7 percent (1.4 trillion dollars) with losses across regions”. “The biggest declines in incomes are recorded by China and the US, up to 3.5% (USD 426 billion) and 1.6% (USD 313 billion), respectively. The sectors most affected include: agriculture, chemicals and transport equipment in the US; and electronic equipment, machinery and other manufacturing in China” [24].

If counterfeiting continues to increase, the costs associated with counterfeiting will eventually outweigh the benefits of producing or selling the brand in China. At that point, brand owners will be confronted with the choice of discontinuing the brand in China or rethinking their current approach. Brand owners may take the drastic step of curtailing or withdrawing their investments from China or brand owners and foreign governments may adopt a confrontational approach with China. If brand owners and foreign governments attempt to pressure China with confrontational tactics, it is unclear that such an approach will achieve positive results in reducing counterfeiting.178

[Footnote 178: Attempts by the United States to pressure China over copyright piracy issues in the early 1990s almost led to a trade war on two occasions with both sides refusing to back down. See supra note 27. A trade war was averted by last minute maneuvering, but because China has made significant economic progress since the early 1990s and is in a stronger economic position in relation to other nations, China may be unwilling to back down in face of new pressures from the United States or other foreign governments over counterfeiting issues.]